Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
961. Directional Scanner distances - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I really wish I could change that setting, it annoys me to no end.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.16 09:33:36
|
962. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
MrQuisno wrote: I still think we are still missing a capital ship here. Why can't we get a super class for force Auxiliary with special abilities. You would use these type of ships which give special abilities out side the scope of command ship...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.15 21:59:28
|
963. Blue print stacking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It'd be nice if BPCs with identical stats could be stacked. Then it'd just be up to the users to make them identical if they want to stack them.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.15 20:09:09
|
964. Why are there no republic fleet faction missiles? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I was thinking about this the other day. I was thinking that faction EM missiles should be Imperial Navy and faction explosive missiles should be Republic Fleet. Federation navy doesn't need any missiles, plus that leaves two types for Caldari Nav...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.15 07:17:15
|
965. Contracts with containers small change - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
We definitely need work on contracts to better facilitate containers.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 23:10:12
|
966. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sayod Physulem wrote: "Big groups get impatient" you assume that they act stupid/without skill. So you basically created a sub case of 1.3 where the small group has the advantage. That's not what I said at all. I was explaining that a skilled...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 19:06:07
|
967. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sayod Physulem wrote: Sigh simple truth tables guys... even if the case 1.2 is most likely - case (1) is still better than case (2) at least in my opinion, because then the small group has a chance - even if it may be small You're looking at ...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 10:44:58
|
968. Slight rebalance of mining barges - ?reduce AFK mining - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Darth Squeemus wrote: What's wrong with AFK miners? If they want to lose their stuff because of inattentiveness, let them. If fit properly in high sec, one does not need to be present to prevent the loss of one's ship.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 09:38:06
|
969. Make Ganking(and real PvP) in Hi Sec a boon for PvE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Xe'Cara'eos wrote: how about these sites form from isk-value destroyed and are only accessible to those with a sec status of say.... 1.0 or over? Part of the fun is having pirates in them. No need to make that a chore for the pirates.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 09:37:11
|
970. Make Ganking(and real PvP) in Hi Sec a boon for PvE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Except it's not risk reward. And you are totally not understanding what is actually meant by that statement. It's a blatantly exploitable system which hands even more reward to the low risk ganker. I don't believe it is ...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 05:57:17
|
971. Make Ganking(and real PvP) in Hi Sec a boon for PvE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aden Ordinii wrote: true...its eve, there is allways the idea and a counteridea how to abuse it. The trick is to count on the counteridea and balance it into a valid and fair form of gameplay.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 02:33:30
|
972. Slight rebalance of mining barges - ?reduce AFK mining - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Just get rid of the big rocks in high sec. The really big rocks should only occur outside of empire space.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 02:28:46
|
973. The Worst (allegedly) Marauders - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think you guys just don't know how to use a regular shield booster. ASBs are nice, but they are hardly some overpowered monster item.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 02:27:04
|
974. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The biggest blobs usually win no matter what, but there is a significant variance depending on actual flying skill. Problem is, most of the big blobs are the ones with more skill. You might say TEST is an exception to that, and you'd be quite wron...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 02:21:43
|
975. Does CCP even look at our ideas? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Darwin wrote: The greatest risk posting as a developer is appearing to promise changes that may be slow in coming, if at all. I personally try not to promise specific action unless the work is already in progress and going well. You can't...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.14 00:53:45
|
976. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Here's my idea for how trading carriers with force auxiliaries should work: When rolling out the change, begin allowing players to freely exchange docked carriers for force auxiliary, they simply click a button and a countdown begins. One hour l...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.13 23:59:28
|
977. Expedition Frigate Boosting Ship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lara Sunji wrote: Terrible idea. What's next, logi frigates? .. Wait .. Attack frigates that use three large turrets.
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.13 23:11:39
|
978. Expedition Frigate Boosting Ship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bla5to Frigate wrote: Your Rorqual can't fit in a c-13. That is why this is a niche ship. Did you even read the whole thing? It'll still step on the toes of the mining boosting ships due to how cheap and agile it is. I don't really like th...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.13 20:16:22
|
979. Does CCP even look at our ideas? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Donnachadh wrote: If the Redit style of forum is better for discussing these ideas then why not change the format of these forums? "Better" is a subjective qualifier. Most folks seem to think the Twitter format is a good way to assimilate inf...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.13 20:02:13
|
980. Does CCP even look at our ideas? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I once asked this and got a dev response within the first few posts! The main reason they don't comment much is probably a combination of them being too busy reading the posts as well as not wanting to form an early opinion that could misrepresen...
- by Reaver Glitterstim - at 2015.11.13 04:44:46
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |